Research Paper on Drug Testing Welfare for Benefits

On Drug Testing Welfargon for Benefits - search Paper ExampleOne of the consequences of dose abuse can sometimes be joining the offbeat system when drugs take over the drives and ambitions that would otherwise allow an individual to be able to work up and experience independent. Welfare serves a meaningful purpose in society in trying to help those who are in circumstances where they cannot find meaningful employment. Those who are choosing to use drugs, however, are not on a track towards gainful employment and a successful life. I believe that drug examination for offbeat recipients will effectively limit the amount of drug abusers collecting money. The initial argument would appear to be part of the unlawfulization of the poor that is pervasive within this nation. According to Gustafson, bandage lawmakers and the public seem loth to devote tax dollars to providing cash benefits to the poor, there seems to be a great willingness to spend money to legal philosophy the poo r even when doing so seems to be economically inefficient or ineffective (59). The attitude of Americans seems to be that being poor is the equivalent of being unrighteous or criminal. There is a vast misinterpret ab bulge what it is to be poor. Poverty most often does not occur because of poor choices of a criminal nature, but because of poor choices on a social level. This can mean everything from bad investments to having chosen to work for a company that eventually layoffs its employees. A poor choice is not the same as an immoral choice, and the consequences are not always predictable. Still, the American public does not seem willing to spend realistic money to help others out of poverty but is more than willing to spend money to illegalise the desperation that comes from being poor. One of the desperations that come from being poor can be drug abuse. While the vast majority of people on welfare are not drug users, there is a portion that are on welfare because of drug abu se or who have turned to drug use to relieve the pain of poverty. According to Gustafson, Drug use among welfare recipients appears to be higher(prenominal) than drug use in the general population, but drug dependence which interferes with relationships and work, may not be higher (60). Furthermore, Gustafson goes on to say that even if welfare recipients use drugs, the vast majority who would be subjected to drug quizing do not (60). Therefore, it is not the majority who would be affected by drug testing and in order to combat the social problems associated with drug use, alternative services would need to be provided. It is clear that drug use among welfare recipients is counterproductive to the goals of welfare. The goal of welfare is to provide for people while they climb out of poverty towards a more successful upcoming. Using drugs diminishes the ability of individuals as they endeavor to function in a productive society. Drug users need intercession, however, not to be goa l seeking where employment and future success is concerned. Allowing people who are using drugs to continue in the welfare system is a harry of those resources and should not be a part of that system. It would be more cost effective to treat those who test positive, providing care for their children during that time period, than it is to continue criminalizing that behavior. The costs of the drug war is three to four times that of providing treatment